Friday, 18 September 2026

End of Term 3

 

More learning time

This is probably my clearest measurable result.

I found that:

  • less time is spent stopping lessons to address low-level behaviour
  • lessons start more quickly
  • transitions between activities become faster
  • students begin tasks with less teacher prompting
  • fewer interruptions are needed during independent work.


By the end of the inquiry, the average amount of learning time lost to low-level behaviour decreased compared with the Term 1 baseline. Students were able to begin learning tasks more independently, allowing greater amounts of uninterrupted teaching and learning time.


Students become more independent with routines

This is an important result because my strategies aren't just about making students behave — they're about changing the classroom systems so students know what to do without waiting for the teacher.

Evidence:

  • students collect and organise resources without prompting
  • students know what to do during transitions
  • students move between activities more efficiently
  • students use visual instructions rather than repeatedly asking the teacher what to do.

Students demonstrated increased independence in following classroom routines, particularly at the beginning of lessons and during transitions. Teacher prompting became less frequent as routines became more familiar and predictable. 

Improved engagement

This is another important outcome.

  • more students beginning tasks promptly
  • fewer students disengaging during teacher instruction
  • increased time on task
  • fewer students needing individual redirection
  • students completing more of the expected learning activity.

A possible result:

Students demonstrated increased engagement during learning blocks, with more students beginning tasks promptly and remaining engaged for longer periods without teacher intervention.

This was measured quite simply through 5-minute engagement observations.

At the beginning of the inquiry, 11/19 students were actively engaged during a 10-minute independent task. By the end of Term 3, 16/18 students were actively engaged during the same type of observation.

A calmer classroom climate

How do my responses to behaviour influence classroom climate?

I found the classroom feels:

  • more predictable
  • calmer
  • less interrupted
  • less dependent on teacher correction
  • more respectful
  • more focused on learning.

A change in my own teaching practice

I have found that I have changed the way I respond to behaviour.

For example:

Before I would have...

Noticed behaviour → stopped teaching → addressed behaviour → repeated instructions → restarted learning.

After (now I)...

Anticipate potential difficulty → pre-correct → use visual/non-verbal cue → reinforce expected behaviour → maintain learning flow.

Reflection:

I became more deliberate in anticipating behaviour rather than responding only once disruption occurred. I used pre-correction, predictable routines, visual supports and non-verbal cues more consistently. This reduced my reliance on whole-class verbal correction and enabled me to maintain the flow of learning.


Tuesday, 24 March 2026

How do my responses to behaviour influence classroom climate?

 Professional Growth Cycle (PGC)

Focus: Maximising Learning Time Through Proactive Classroom Management


Year Level: Year 4

Cycle Timeframe: Term 1 to the end of term 4, 2026.


1. Inquiry Focus

How can I reduce time spent managing behaviour by implementing proactive, structured classroom systems that support engagement and self-regulation for all learners, particularly those with ADHD?


2. Rationale

In my Year 4 classroom, a significant amount of learning time is lost due to managing low-level disruptions and supporting learners with ADHD and behavioural needs. These interruptions impact the flow of teaching and reduce opportunities for sustained engagement.

This inquiry aims to shift my practice from reactive behaviour management to proactive systems that create a calm, structured, and predictable learning environment. This aligns with the refreshed New Zealand Curriculum (2025), which emphasises wellbeing, belonging, and inclusive practice.


3. Teaching Council Standards Links

  • Learning-focused culture: Creating a safe, inclusive, and predictable classroom environment

  • Design for learning: Planning for diverse learners using structured and accessible approaches

  • Teaching: Using effective strategies to maximise engagement and minimise disruption


4. Baseline Data (Weeks 1–2)

Summary of initial findings:

  • Average time lost to behaviour per block:

  • Most frequent behaviours:

  • Times of day with highest disruption:

Reflection:


5. Action Plan

Strategy 1: Strengthening Routines and Transitions

  • Explicitly teach and practise transitions

  • Use consistent signals and countdowns

  • Display visual expectations

Strategy 2: Reducing Downtime

  • Implement “Do Now” tasks at the start of each lesson

  • Ensure materials are prepared in advance

  • Provide early finisher options

Strategy 3: Chunking Learning and Adding Movement

  • Break tasks into manageable steps

  • Include short movement or brain breaks

Strategy 4: Clear Behaviour Expectations

  • Co-construct class expectations (kawa)

  • Regularly revisit and reinforce expectations

Strategy 5: Pre-Correction

  • Remind students of expectations before transitions and key moments

Strategy 6: Targeted Support for Priority Learners

  • Use non-verbal cues and proximity

  • Implement “First–Then” strategies

  • Set short, achievable goals

Strategy 7: Teaching Self-Regulation

  • Teach and model calming strategies

  • Provide a calm/reset space


6. Evidence Collection

Quantitative Evidence

  • Reduction in time lost to behaviour

  • Transition speed improvements

  • Frequency of key behaviours

Qualitative Evidence

  • Student voice

  • Teacher reflections

  • Observations (self or peer)


7. Mid-Cycle Reflection

What is working well?

What needs adjusting?

Impact on priority learners:


8. End-of-Cycle Reflection

What changes did I make to my practice?

What impact did these changes have on student behaviour and engagement?

How has this improved learning time?

What will I continue or refine next?